On Wed, Jan 14, 1998 at 05:25:31PM -0500, Alex deVries wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Jan 1998, Alan Cox wrote:
> > > hmm, to do this with only one src.rpm, we need a little support from
> > > rpm. At the moment mips is defined for mipsel and mipseb. I would suggest,
> > > that for .spec execution mips is defined for bot mipsel and mipseb,
> > > because
> > > there are changes, which work for both and we only need to seperate
> > > changes
> > > like that needed by ncompress. Comments ? Does anybody how to do this ?
> > Just ask Erik Troan nicely
> He has already agreed to it, I just need to submit my patches to RPM that
> do the detection of the byte order for setting the soft-coded default
> architecture. It'll be done by the end of the week.
Ah, you were the volunteer :-) Recently I fixed RPM already, so we should
somewhen deciede who's patch is the nicer.