| To: | Miguel de Icaza <miguel@nuclecu.unam.mx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Polishing the cache routines ... |
| From: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@uni-koblenz.de> |
| Date: | Sun, 21 Dec 1997 20:12:07 +0100 |
| Cc: | ralf@mailhost.uni-koblenz.de, linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com |
| In-reply-to: | <199712211900.NAA18285@athena.nuclecu.unam.mx>; from Miguel de Icaza on Sun, Dec 21, 1997 at 01:00:51PM -0600 |
| References: | <19971220224036.52320@uni-koblenz.de> <199712211900.NAA18285@athena.nuclecu.unam.mx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com |
On Sun, Dec 21, 1997 at 01:00:51PM -0600, Miguel de Icaza wrote: > > > minor side effects of polishing the cache routines ... > > > > Ralf > > What exactly did the polishing do? I saw that we are down in a couple > of tests. Most of these values where we went down aren't stable across several runs. The improoved values for the exec & sh test however were pretty stable. The optimization was getting rid of flushing the second level cache in r4k_flush_page_to_ram_d32i32(). Ralf |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Polishing the cache routines ..., Miguel de Icaza |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | flush_cache_all() hoses my Indy, Mike Shaver |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Polishing the cache routines ..., Miguel de Icaza |
| Next by Thread: | Linux-installer-0.1.tar.gz, Mike Shaver |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |