| To: | "David Chatterton" <chatz@omen.melbourne.sgi.com>, Lige Hensley <ligeh@carpediem.com>, Chris Carlson <cwcarlson@home.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Linux on the O2 |
| From: | "Greg Chesson" <greg@xtp.engr.sgi.com> |
| Date: | Thu, 4 Dec 1997 09:03:53 -0800 |
| Cc: | linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com |
| In-reply-to: | "David Chatterton" <chatz@omen.melbourne.sgi.com> "Re: Linux on the O2" (Dec 4, 5:08pm) |
| References: | <Pine.SGI.3.96.971204001929.20475A-100000@barramunda> <9712041708.ZM8190@omen.melbourne.sgi.com> |
| Sender: | owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com |
I've been reading the O2 thread with great interest. It seems to me that a "vanilla" port of Linux on the O2 is quite feasible. Several writers have agreed. But full support in Linux for extremem platform-dependent multimedia hardware is problematic. This has also been mentioned by several writers, some of whom developed the OS code. The problems are twofold: it would be a non-trivial task even with full documentation to provide complete support for O2 hardware since the job would require as much new invention as it would require porting, and second- full disclosure of the inner workings is viewed as too much of a giveaway to present and future competitors. Makes me wonder whether the Indy port of Linux could be ratcheted into a vanilla port for the O2, and then perhaps SGI could produce binary loadable drivers for the missing bits. g |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Linux on the O2, Greg Chesson |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: A question about architecture and byte order with RPMs, Alex deVries |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Linux on the O2, Lige Hensley |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Linux on the O2, William J. Earl |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |