| To: | cypher@vertigo.cs.indiana.edu (cypher) |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Linux on the O2 |
| From: | alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (Alan Cox) |
| Date: | Wed, 3 Dec 1997 00:09:26 +0000 (GMT) |
| Cc: | linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.3.95.971202161948.10955B-100000@vertigo.cs.indiana.edu> from "cypher" at Dec 2, 97 04:50:40 pm |
| Sender: | owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com |
> I'm guessing that they're looking at this as if an Indy running Linux > won't really be that competetive with the O2s runnning IRIX, which I can > almost understand. Ah conspiracy theories abound. It could just be they didnt want anyone cloning their hardware > I realize that SGI has a vested interest in seeing IRIX succeed, and IRIX > is probably (it hurts to say this) better than Linux when running 128 (or > soon 4096) CPUs. Linux however, is great lightweight OS for workstations Right now Linux scales to about 2-3 CPU's for generic stuff in 2.1.x maybe 4 if the hardware is sane (eg Ultrasparc). To go to 128-4096 CPU's really involves changing the fundamental rules and building a sort of very tightly interlinked multicomputer - AP1000+ on steroids as it were. There is some interest in this from various people, notably in sticking 9 or 10 EBSA285 Digital strongarm boards in a PCI backplane and using PCI bus as the backbone network. Alan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Kernel in the CVS, ralf |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Linux on the O2, Alan Cox |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Linux on the O2, Alan Cox |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Linux on the O2, Chris Carlson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |