| To: | davem@dm.cobaltmicro.com (David S. Miller) |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Pentium F00F bug Linux workaround; BSDI Response |
| From: | alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (Alan Cox) |
| Date: | Mon, 17 Nov 1997 23:56:37 +0000 (GMT) |
| Cc: | fisher@sgi.com, linux@hollywood.engr.sgi.com, fisher@hollywood.engr.sgi.com |
| In-reply-to: | <199711172323.PAA27334@dm.cobaltmicro.com> from "David S. Miller" at Nov 17, 97 03:23:46 pm |
| Sender: | owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com |
> BSDI putting out their patch ahead of that point in time was, if > anything, totally against how Intel wanted things happen. Dave talk this off list. And if you are going to say things like "XYZ violated their NDA" expect them to both hear about it and reply. Fair's fair. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Pentium F00F bug Linux workaround; BSDI Response, David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Announce: New development tools uploaded, ralf |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Pentium F00F bug Linux workaround; BSDI Response, David S. Miller |
| Next by Thread: | Announce: New development tools uploaded, ralf |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |