Thus spake Jan Rychter:
> int-handler.S: Assembler messages:
> int-handler.S:64: Error: .previous without corresponding .section; ignored
> int-handler.S:70: Error: .previous without corresponding .section; ignored
> int-handler.S:73: Error: .previous without corresponding .section; ignored
> int-handler.S:172: Error: .previous without corresponding .section; ignored
> int-handler.S:250: Error: .previous without corresponding .section; ignored
> int-handler.S:270: Error: .previous without corresponding .section; ignored
> int-handler.S:271: Error: .previous without corresponding .section; ignored
> int-handler.S:294: Error: .previous without corresponding .section; ignored
Are you using the Intel crosstools from the crossdev directory?
You'll need newer ones, we think, and I'm going to build a new tarball
shortly. (Tonight?)
> So, any hope for a ready-to-run-barely-bootable-but-binary thing on ftp
> somewhere ? I was kinda expecting this from mr. David "SPARC precompiled
> kernels for people" Miller :-)
When I get my crosstools working again, I'll build something to put
up.
(I can't test it, unfortunately, but hey...)
> BTW, isn't this a typo ?
>
> --- sni.h-original Sat Jun 14 19:38:41 1997
> +++ sni.h Sat Jun 14 19:38:45 1997
> @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@
> /*
> * ASIC PCI registers for little endian configuration.
> */
> -#ifndef __MIPSEL__
> +#ifdef __MIPSEL__
> #error "Fix me for big endian"
> #endif
> #define PCIMT_UCONF 0xbfff0000
Don't think so.
If it's not little-endian (#ifndef __MIPSEL__), then it's big-endian
and needs to be fixed.
Mike
--
#> Mike Shaver (shaver@ingenia.com) Ingenia Communications Corporation
#> Chief System Architect and Herder of Bits
#>
#> "Yoda say, `Just slap a little public key crypto into it' does not
#> a secure system make." -- Marcus J. Ranum (mjr@clark.net)
|