| To: | jwiede@blammo.engr.sgi.com (John Wiederhirn) |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Linux GGI and Linux/SGI |
| From: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@mailhost.uni-koblenz.de> |
| Date: | Sat, 9 Aug 1997 03:23:35 +0200 (MET DST) |
| Cc: | linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com |
| In-reply-to: | <9708081540.ZM26801@blammo.engr.sgi.com> from "John Wiederhirn" at Aug 8, 97 03:40:30 pm |
| Sender: | owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com |
> > Well, we have discussed using GGI. Last I checkend GGI was still itself > > in a state of flux and the last thing I want to do is to open another > > battle field. Technical reasons against GGI was mostly that the original > > design was very bloated as far as the kernel is affected. This has > > been improoved somwhat since. > > I'm not so attached to the notion of GGI as much as for gfx > having an in-kernel-space presence in Linux (Linux/SGI is > going to need this, as I suspect is any Linux that attempts > hardware acceleration of OpenGL or other similar APIs). Miguel "Da Newport Man" de Icaza is working on the required kernel stuff. Since a real native GFX support is a fairly big project currently the emulation stuff needed for the SGI X server has priority. Ralf |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Linux GGI and Linux/SGI, John Wiederhirn |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [no subject], Vincent Renardias |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Linux GGI and Linux/SGI, John Wiederhirn |
| Next by Thread: | [no subject], Vincent Renardias |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |