| To: | jwiede@blammo.engr.sgi.com (John Wiederhirn) |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Possible X solutions. |
| From: | alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (Alan Cox) |
| Date: | Fri, 25 Jul 1997 09:58:42 +0100 (BST) |
| Cc: | linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com |
| In-reply-to: | <9707241356.ZM3565@blammo.engr.sgi.com> from "John Wiederhirn" at Jul 24, 97 01:56:34 pm |
| Sender: | owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com |
> Has anyone considered perhaps partnering with either Metrolink > or Xi Graphics (makers of Accelerated-X) and having _them_ be > the providers of the X server for SGI? If there's not going to be a free X server for the SGI then Ariel can keep the machine... > B. Gives us a venue by which SGI can provide optimized > versions of OpenGL for Linux/Intel. This is what we > could bring to the table. > > C. Lends additional credibility to the Linux/SGI port. These two are probably good reasons for having a valued added option. However crippling a required system component isnt. Alan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | An update..., Alex deVries |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Modutils 2.1.42 for MIPS, Ralf Baechle |
| Previous by Thread: | Possible X solutions., John Wiederhirn |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Possible X solutions., Miguel de Icaza |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |