| To: | shaver@neon.ingenia.ca |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: irix_times |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@jenolan.rutgers.edu> |
| Date: | Sun, 11 May 1997 18:55:08 -0400 |
| Cc: | linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com |
| In-reply-to: | <199705112256.SAA11805@neon.ingenia.ca> (message from Mike Shaver on Sun, 11 May 1997 18:56:35 -0400 (EDT)) |
| Sender: | owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com |
From: Mike Shaver <shaver@neon.ingenia.ca> Date: Sun, 11 May 1997 18:56:35 -0400 (EDT) gcc tells me, quite rightly, that error may be used without initialization, and I'm wondering if the hiding of error in the C<if (tbuf)> block is intentional. I assume not, but I thought I'd make sure it just wasn't davem outsmarting me again. =) Thats just my stupidity, the obvious fix is the intended code. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | irix_times, Mike Shaver |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | progress..., Mike Shaver |
| Previous by Thread: | irix_times, Mike Shaver |
| Next by Thread: | progress..., Mike Shaver |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |