| To: | ariel@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Are you satisfied now Mr. McVoy? ;-) |
| From: | wje@fir.esd.sgi.com (William J. Earl) |
| Date: | Mon, 10 Jun 1996 10:02:50 -0700 |
| Cc: | dm@neteng.engr.sgi.com (David S. Miller), linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com |
| In-reply-to: | <199606081822.LAA01539@yon.engr.sgi.com> |
| References: | <199606081123.EAA07860@neteng.engr.sgi.com> <199606081822.LAA01539@yon.engr.sgi.com> |
| Sender: | owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com |
Ariel Faigon writes:
> >
> >
> >Calibrating delay loop.. ok - 91.96 BogoMIPS
> >
> Will a Triton CPU (R5000) make this better ? :-)
An R5000 should scale with clock rate, relative to the 133 MHZ R4600
David is using. The 180 MHZ R5000 would then be 124.46.
> For those who are not familiar with bogomips, my Pentium-100
> at home does 39.94 bogomips. And the best number I've seen
> for a desktop is almost 300 bogomips for an Alpha 21064
> overclocked to 300MHz. The 91.96 number for a 150MHz Indy
> sounds pretty good.
I think the 150 MHZ R4400 is in David's host machine, with the
133 MHZ R4600 in his target machine, so the 91.96 should be for the latter.
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Are you satisfied now Mr. McVoy? ;-), David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | oh btw..., David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Are you satisfied now Mr. McVoy? ;-), Ariel Faigon |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Are you satisfied now Mr. McVoy? ;-), William J. Earl |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |