| To: | davem@caip.rutgers.edu (David S. Miller) |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: lmbench with new checksum code... |
| From: | Alan Cox <alan@cymru.net> |
| Date: | Thu, 16 May 1996 10:35:04 +0100 (BST) |
| Cc: | lmlinux@neteng.engr.sgi.com, torvalds@cs.helsinki.fi, sparclinux-cvs@caipfs.rutgers.edu, alan@cymru.net |
| In-reply-to: | <199605160653.CAA12098@huahaga.rutgers.edu> from "David S. Miller" at May 16, 96 02:53:50 am |
| Sender: | owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com |
> I doubt I can get 2mb/s more out of my code to beat solaris, sigh, > where the heck could all this overhead possibly be??? What makes you think the Solaris loopback is even doing checksums or a memcpy via kernel space ? They only way you'll beat solaris at the loopback network game is to cheat as they do. Make tcp_connect spot a localhost connection change the socket method to something akin to af_unix but streamlined a bit (only special case is urgent data). Alan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: mpp kernel interface, Alan Cox |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: lmbench with new checksum code..., Linus Torvalds |
| Previous by Thread: | lmbench with new checksum code..., David S. Miller |
| Next by Thread: | Re: lmbench with new checksum code..., Linus Torvalds |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |