| To: | "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [patch] linux: New style IRQs for DECstation |
| From: | Jun Sun <jsun@mvista.com> |
| Date: | Tue, 09 Apr 2002 10:36:20 -0700 |
| Cc: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@uni-koblenz.de>, linux-mips@fnet.fr, linux-mips@oss.sgi.com |
| References: | <Pine.GSO.3.96.1020409153428.397F-100000@delta.ds2.pg.gda.pl> |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.4) Gecko/20011126 Netscape6/6.2.1 |
Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: I can't see a reason why to handle this option in system-specific code. How about "there will be likely no such CPUs/systems in the future"?Your patch will force every new CPU to add FPUEX option to the cpu_option, where apparently no place really need to use it. Leaving FPU exception enabled for a CPU that does not generate FPU exception is acceptable. (because it does *not* generate FPU exceptions). And hooking up/dispatching the FPU exception interrupt is system-specific already anyway. It, however, makes sense to provide a common wrapper code for fpu interrupt to jump to fpu exception handling code. Over-abstraction can make the picture cloudy rather than clear. My 2 cents. Jun |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [patch] linux: New style IRQs for DECstation, Maciej W. Rozycki |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [patch] linux: New style IRQs for DECstation, Maciej W. Rozycki |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [patch] linux: New style IRQs for DECstation, Maciej W. Rozycki |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [patch] linux: New style IRQs for DECstation, Maciej W. Rozycki |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |