"Maciej W. Rozycki" wrote:
>
> On Mon, 13 Aug 2001, Ralf Baechle wrote:
>
> > > The following patch exports mips_machtype to modules. Please apply.
> >
> > Ok - but I'd like to burry the whole mips_machtype mechanism in 2.5. To
> > messy and requires a central authority to allocate machine types. What
> > do you think?
>
> No idea at the moment. For DECs things are pretty easy. The firmware
> returns a unique system ID for each different kind of hardware. It can be
> used instead (actually mips_machtype is initialized bazed on what firmware
> reports). The ID is mostly useful for system-specific stuff, e.g. onboard
> devices that cannot be identified or probed in another way.
>
> Note that for PCI-based systems, there is usually no problem -- PCI IDs
> can be used instead in most cases.
>
How? In fact, I've got two different boards with the same Ethernet chip.
Moreover, mach type shall be known as early as possible, early than pci
init for sure. Just imagine, I need a way to identify PCI controller by
mach type, so I need to scan pci busses for specific ID. Boom. :-) Did I
miss something in your proposal?
BTW, in my Baget case, I just need a number for mach type. I can ask to
change my prom in worst case.
Regards,
Gleb.
|