| To: | anthony.wei@philips.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Has anyone successfully reduced the size of libc.so? |
| From: | Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> |
| Date: | Thu, 3 May 2001 18:52:01 +0100 (BST) |
| Cc: | linux-mips@oss.sgi.com, linux-mips@fnet.fr, brad@ltc.com |
| In-reply-to: | <0056910011804600000002L102*@MHS> from "anthony.wei@philips.com" at May 03, 2001 12:19:21 PM |
> Has anyone successfully reduced the size of the libc.so? Not much. And Ulrich made very valid points about why this would fail. Someone should probably port newlib over as that is designed to be modular. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Has anyone successfully reduced the size of libc.so?, anthony . wei |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [patch] 2.4.4: mmap() fails for certain legal requests, Maciej W. Rozycki |
| Previous by Thread: | Has anyone successfully reduced the size of libc.so?, anthony . wei |
| Next by Thread: | [patch] 2.4.4: mmap() fails for certain legal requests, Maciej W. Rozycki |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |