linux-mips-fnet
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: stable binutils, gcc, glibc ...

To: Jay Carlson <nop@nop.com>
Subject: Re: stable binutils, gcc, glibc ...
From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@oss.sgi.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2000 18:12:57 +0200
Cc: Jay Carlson <nop@place.org>, linux-mips@fnet.fr, linux-mips@oss.sgi.com
In-reply-to: <KEEOIBGCMINLAHMMNDJNGECBCAAA.nop@nop.com>; from nop@nop.com on Sat, Oct 14, 2000 at 12:11:39PM -0400
References: <20001014170928.B6499@bacchus.dhis.org> <KEEOIBGCMINLAHMMNDJNGECBCAAA.nop@nop.com>
On Sat, Oct 14, 2000 at 12:11:39PM -0400, Jay Carlson wrote:

> > Actually I'm trying to kill this entire naming problem by getting all
> > patches back to the respective maintainers.  Result:  no pending patches
> > for cvs binutils, only tiny ones for glibc-current and egcs-current.
> 
> What's going to happen to glibc 2.0.6?  I suspect the embedded people are
> going to be stuck using it until we figure out how to trim down the binary
> size of 2.2.

Which why I guess we still have to maintain it for a while or even come
up with some alternative small libc.

  Ralf

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>