linux-mips-fnet
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: stable binutils, gcc, glibc ...

To: "Ralf Baechle" <ralf@oss.sgi.com>, "Jay Carlson" <nop@place.org>
Subject: RE: stable binutils, gcc, glibc ...
From: "Jay Carlson" <nop@nop.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2000 12:11:39 -0400
Cc: <linux-mips@fnet.fr>, <linux-mips@oss.sgi.com>
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <20001014170928.B6499@bacchus.dhis.org>
[don't you hate it when you remember something you wanted to ask right after
you hit send?]

Ralf Baechle writes:

> Actually I'm trying to kill this entire naming problem by getting all
> patches back to the respective maintainers.  Result:  no pending patches
> for cvs binutils, only tiny ones for glibc-current and egcs-current.

What's going to happen to glibc 2.0.6?  I suspect the embedded people are
going to be stuck using it until we figure out how to trim down the binary
size of 2.2.

Jay

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>