linux-mips-fnet
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: stable binutils, gcc, glibc ...

To: Ralf Baechle <ralf@oss.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: stable binutils, gcc, glibc ...
From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@oss.sgi.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2000 06:21:00 +0200
Cc: Jun Sun <jsun@mvista.com>, linux-mips@fnet.fr, linux-mips@oss.sgi.com
In-reply-to: <20001014055550.B3816@bacchus.dhis.org>; from ralf@oss.sgi.com on Sat, Oct 14, 2000 at 05:55:50AM +0200
References: <39E7EB73.9206D0DB@mvista.com> <20001014055550.B3816@bacchus.dhis.org>
On Sat, Oct 14, 2000 at 05:55:50AM +0200, Ralf Baechle wrote:

> > 1. binutils
> > -----------
> > 
> > a) latest binutil cvs tree (v2.10) + debian patch
> > 
> > http://sourceware.cygnus.com/binutils/
> > ftp://ftp.rfc822.org/pub/local/debian-mips/patches/rel32-binutils.diff
> > 
> > b) Andreas Jaeger recommanded Ulf's patch against the CVS tree.  He
> > recommanded 
> > 
> > ftp://oss.sgi.com/pub/linux/mips/src/binutils/binutils-000420.diff.gz.  
> > 
> > But I only found the following file.
> > 
> > ftp://oss.sgi.com/pub/linux/mips/binutils/binutils-000424.diff.gz
> 
> The binutils paragraph is old new.  All of the required patches are now
> in binutils except one which I sent to Ulf yesterday.

So Ulf commited the patch into the binutils cvs.  Therefore no more
pending patches for binutils-current.

  Ralf

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>