linux-mips-fnet
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: load_unaligned() and "uld" instruction

To: Jun Sun <jsun@mvista.com>
Subject: Re: load_unaligned() and "uld" instruction
From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@oss.sgi.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2000 00:26:35 +0200
Cc: linux-mips@fnet.fr, linux-mips@oss.sgi.com
In-reply-to: <39DE7DD3.7A67B19E@mvista.com>; from jsun@mvista.com on Fri, Oct 06, 2000 at 06:35:15PM -0700
References: <39CFC567.DD66BC56@mvista.com> <000d01c02782$32d31560$0deca8c0@Ulysses> <39D0E51C.79A0BE50@mvista.com> <20001005141354.E30075@bacchus.dhis.org> <39DD26CC.3805FFE8@mvista.com> <00d101c02f04$3a6d7340$0deca8c0@Ulysses> <39DD55E9.AFCACB0E@mvista.com> <011801c02f19$1283f6a0$0deca8c0@Ulysses> <39DD68DE.E9B26A3D@mvista.com> <39DE7DD3.7A67B19E@mvista.com>
On Fri, Oct 06, 2000 at 06:35:15PM -0700, Jun Sun wrote:

> While the __ldq_u() did work, I had a couple of syntax problems with
> put_unaligned().  See the patch below.
> 
> In addition, my usb subsystem now hangs.  It might mean a bug in the new
> unaligned.h or the fix to unaligned.h reveals another bug.  I will let
> you know.

I had already a patch for a the x vs. val thing in the CVS, so I just took
the part which adds the additional brackets from your patch to make
sure the semantic is identical with functions calls.

  Ralf

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>