| To: | "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: load_unaligned() and "uld" instruction |
| From: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@oss.sgi.com> |
| Date: | Fri, 6 Oct 2000 18:21:22 +0200 |
| Cc: | Jun Sun <jsun@mvista.com>, "Kevin D. Kissell" <kevink@mips.com>, Dominic Sweetman <dom@algor.co.uk>, linux-mips@oss.sgi.com, linux-mips@fnet.fr |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.GSO.3.96.1001006113602.26752A-100000@delta.ds2.pg.gda.pl>; from macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl on Fri, Oct 06, 2000 at 11:54:18AM +0200 |
| References: | <20001006024337.A3429@bacchus.dhis.org> <Pine.GSO.3.96.1001006113602.26752A-100000@delta.ds2.pg.gda.pl> |
On Fri, Oct 06, 2000 at 11:54:18AM +0200, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > I vote for dual code for now and then we may remove the egcs 1.0.3 > compatibility cruft one day (for 2.6, for example). Not much point in that - we end up with performancewise identical code for both C and assembler variants with current compilers. So whenever we finally retire egcs 1.0.3 I think we should switch completly to the new compiler and the C written unaligned.h. Ralf |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: insmod hates RELA?, Maciej W. Rozycki |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: load_unaligned() and "uld" instruction, Ralf Baechle |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: load_unaligned() and "uld" instruction, Maciej W. Rozycki |
| Next by Thread: | Re: load_unaligned() and "uld" instruction, Dominic Sweetman |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |