linux-mips-fnet
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: load_unaligned() and "uld" instruction

To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl>
Subject: Re: load_unaligned() and "uld" instruction
From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@oss.sgi.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2000 18:21:22 +0200
Cc: Jun Sun <jsun@mvista.com>, "Kevin D. Kissell" <kevink@mips.com>, Dominic Sweetman <dom@algor.co.uk>, linux-mips@oss.sgi.com, linux-mips@fnet.fr
In-reply-to: <Pine.GSO.3.96.1001006113602.26752A-100000@delta.ds2.pg.gda.pl>; from macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl on Fri, Oct 06, 2000 at 11:54:18AM +0200
References: <20001006024337.A3429@bacchus.dhis.org> <Pine.GSO.3.96.1001006113602.26752A-100000@delta.ds2.pg.gda.pl>
On Fri, Oct 06, 2000 at 11:54:18AM +0200, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:

>  I vote for dual code for now and then we may remove the egcs 1.0.3
> compatibility cruft one day (for 2.6, for example). 

Not much point in that - we end up with performancewise identical code for
both C and assembler variants with current compilers.  So whenever we
finally retire egcs 1.0.3 I think we should switch completly to the
new compiler and the C written unaligned.h.

  Ralf

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>