| To: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@oss.sgi.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: One more gcc patch |
| From: | Andreas Jaeger <aj@suse.de> |
| Date: | 12 Sep 2000 18:14:07 +0200 |
| Cc: | Ulf Carlsson <ulfc@engr.sgi.com>, Keith M Wesolowski <wesolows@foobazco.org>, "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl>, linux-mips@oss.sgi.com, linux-mips@fnet.fr |
| In-reply-to: | Ralf Baechle's message of "Fri, 8 Sep 2000 20:58:11 +0200" |
| Mail-copies-to: | never |
| References: | <20000908205810.A11920@bacchus.dhis.org> |
| Sender: | aj@suse.de |
| User-agent: | Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.1 (Channel Islands) |
>>>>> Ralf Baechle writes:
> Ooops, this fixes a bug in the previous patch for gcc-current. So this
> patch does:
> - fix constructors which were not run for shared libs
> - fix warnings when building the compiler itself
> - Keith's gcse patch
> - gcc was generating code which was calling __main from the beginning of
> main which is wrong for Linux
Did you run the testsuite?
It doesn't seem to fix C++:
=== libstdc++ Summary ===
# of expected passes 9
# of unexpected failures 10
# of expected failures 11
The number for g++ are even worse, I stopped the check
Any idea how to get C++ working?
Andreas
--
Andreas Jaeger
SuSE Labs aj@suse.de
private aj@arthur.inka.de
http://www.suse.de/~aj
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Indy, Christos Ricudis |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: One more gcc patch, Ralf Baechle |
| Previous by Thread: | One more gcc patch, Ralf Baechle |
| Next by Thread: | Re: One more gcc patch, Ralf Baechle |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |