linux-mips-fnet
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Icache coherency problems for R3400, DS5000/240

To: Dominic Sweetman <dom@algor.co.uk>
Subject: Re: Icache coherency problems for R3400, DS5000/240
From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@oss.sgi.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2000 01:52:24 +0200
Cc: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl>, Harald Koerfgen <Harald.Koerfgen@home.ivm.de>, linux-mips@fnet.fr, linux-mips@oss.sgi.com
In-reply-to: <200006192346.AAA03494@mudchute.algor.co.uk>; from dom@algor.co.uk on Tue, Jun 20, 2000 at 12:46:11AM +0100
References: <Pine.GSO.3.96.1000619110632.10348D-100000@delta.ds2.pg.gda.pl> <20000620000455.B27454@bacchus.dhis.org> <200006192346.AAA03494@mudchute.algor.co.uk>
On Tue, Jun 20, 2000 at 12:46:11AM +0100, Dominic Sweetman wrote:

> And while I'm here, I'll continue my lonely campaign.  I suggest you
> don't say "flush" because nobody knows whether it means invalidate,
> write-back, or both[1].  Instead, say "invalidate", "writeback", or
> "both".  Even if it means changing St Linus' function names...

Sigh, I tried exactly this and got fire from the 68k fraction because
they considered my naming ambigous.

  Ralf

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>