| To: | linux-embedded@waste.org |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Calling testers for another Dead Function Optimisation update |
| From: | greyham@research.canon.com.au (Graham Stoney) |
| Date: | Mon, 15 May 2000 10:59:24 +1000 (EST) |
| Cc: | linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu, linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, linux-alpha@vger.rutgers.edu, linux-mips@fnet.fr, sparclinux@vger.rutgers.edu, linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org |
| In-reply-to: | <20000511034105.0046250B7F@brixi.research.canon.com.au> from "Graham Stoney" at May 11, 2000 01:41:05 PM |
Ugh. Something stuffed up; the patch on the ftp site didn't get updated before
I mailed my last message, and I've only just noticed. I blame Microsoft; heck,
who wouldn't?
If you wanted to try this, take another look at:
http://members.xoom.com/greyhams/linux/patches/2.2/funcsect.patch
This time you'll find that the rationale _is_ there. It's a lot more
meaningful.
Sorry,
Graham
--
Graham Stoney
Principal Hardware/Software Engineer
Canon Information Systems Research Australia
Ph: +61 2 9805 2909 Fax: +61 2 9805 2929
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Calling testers for another Dead Function Optimisation update, Dan Malek |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: CHALLENGE: forbidding processes to smash their stack, Biscondi, Philippe |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Calling testers for another Dead Function Optimisation updat, Jeremy Fitzhardinge |
| Next by Thread: | CHALLENGE: forbidding processes to smash their stack, Biscondi, Philippe |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |