| To: | "Bradley D. LaRonde" <brad@ltc.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Location of init_task_union |
| From: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@uni-koblenz.de> |
| Date: | Tue, 23 Nov 1999 23:21:10 +0100 |
| Cc: | linux@engr.sgi.com, linux-mips@fnet.fr, linux-mips@vger.rutgers.edu |
| In-reply-to: | <01f101bf3601$0cf42fa0$b8119526@ltc.com> |
| References: | <007801bf3500$90edf810$b8119526@ltc.com> <19991123230824.E16508@uni-koblenz.de> <01f101bf3601$0cf42fa0$b8119526@ltc.com> |
On Tue, Nov 23, 1999 at 05:21:12PM -0500, Bradley D. LaRonde wrote: > > > I can easily move it to .data or .data.init_task like i386, but I'm > > > wondering if there is some special reason why it is in .text on mips and > > > .data on i386. > > > > Doesn't matter when it ends up, it only needs to be 8kb aligned which is > > why we have to do such silly things. > > i386 does it by putting it in it's own segment, then aligning that segment > in the linker script. Can we switch to that way? Yes. I already did this in my private source for another, MIPS64 related reason. Ralf |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Another .text question, Ralf Baechle |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Location of init_task_union, Gleb O. Raiko |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Location of init_task_union, Bradley D. LaRonde |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Location of init_task_union, Bradley D. LaRonde |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |