| To: | "Bradley D. LaRonde" <brad@ltc.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: MIPS64 |
| From: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@uni-koblenz.de> |
| Date: | Mon, 23 Aug 1999 00:28:31 +0200 |
| Cc: | linux@engr.sgi.com, linux-mips@fnet.fr, linux-mips@vger.rutgers.edu |
| In-reply-to: | <012601beeceb$6a4d19a0$b8119526@ltc.com>; from Bradley D. LaRonde on Sun, Aug 22, 1999 at 06:12:25PM -0400 |
| References: | <19990822141504.A15701@uni-koblenz.de> <00ee01beece1$18b16bf0$b8119526@ltc.com> <19990822231747.D16497@uni-koblenz.de> <012601beeceb$6a4d19a0$b8119526@ltc.com> |
On Sun, Aug 22, 1999 at 06:12:25PM -0400, Bradley D. LaRonde wrote: > > > Good news. I think this is a good move, especially if a flood of new > ports > > > to new device starts pouring in from our project (LinuxCE). There are > > > already three new platoforms and two new processors on the drawing board > > > now. > > > > Note that it's not compeltly impossible, just unattractive to make a > > generic kernel. So if necessary we can do it. > > I'm also thinking that platform-specifc kernels will be smaller and > potentially faster (less indirection), which is especially important on > platforms like the Clio and Cassiopea. For many systems we cannot drop all indirections. For example the Indy shipped with a large number of CPU options, each of which we have an optimized routine for. Ralf |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: MIPS64, Bradley D. LaRonde |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: SA_* in Linux 2.0.x und 2.2.x, Andreas Jaeger |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: MIPS64, Bradley D. LaRonde |
| Next by Thread: | Re: MIPS64, Gleb O. Raiko |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |