linux-mips-fnet
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: CVS

To: Ralf Baechle <ralf@uni-koblenz.de>
Subject: Re: CVS
From: Ulf Carlsson <ulfc@thepuffingroup.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Jun 1999 20:31:40 +0200
Cc: linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com, linux-mips@fnet.fr, linux-mips@vger.rutgers.edu
In-reply-to: <19990613185518.A11493@uni-koblenz.de>; from Ralf Baechle on Sun, Jun 13, 1999 at 06:55:23PM +0200
Mail-followup-to: Ralf Baechle <ralf@uni-koblenz.de>, linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com, linux-mips@fnet.fr, linux-mips@vger.rutgers.edu
References: <19990613185518.A11493@uni-koblenz.de>
On Sun, Jun 13, 1999 at 06:55:23PM +0200, Ralf Baechle wrote:
> I've just commited Linux 2.2.8 into the CVS archive.  Once this is
> finished I'll create a branch named linux_2_2 for the 2.2 development
> in the archive.  If you just do ``cvs update'' you'll stay on the
> mainline of the development, that is 2.3.  If you want to work with
> the 2.2 sources then you'll have to add the option ``-r linux_2_2''
> to your next cvs update or cvs co command.
> 
> I'm already running 2.2.9 and 2.3.1 on my Indy but the checkin is that
> slow that I won't commit these versions into the CVS archive now.

I would appreciate if it was possible to continue using 32 bit code on the Indy,
even if you add 64 bit code. Maybe we can add it as an option in the kernel
configuration scripts?

- Ulf

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • CVS, Ralf Baechle
    • Re: CVS, Ulf Carlsson <=