linux-mips-fnet
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: FYI (part II)

To: Warner Losh <imp@harmony.village.org>, linux-mips@fnet.fr
Subject: Re: FYI (part II)
From: ralf@uni-koblenz.de
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 1999 23:11:38 +0100
Cc: K.H.C.vanHouten@research.kpn.com
In-reply-to: <199902250809.BAA67557@harmony.village.org>; from Warner Losh on Thu, Feb 25, 1999 at 01:09:13AM -0700
References: <199902240854.JAA08376@sparta.research.kpn.com> <199902250809.BAA67557@harmony.village.org>
On Thu, Feb 25, 1999 at 01:09:13AM -0700, Warner Losh wrote:

> In message <199902240854.JAA08376@sparta.research.kpn.com> "Houten
> K.H.C. van (Karel)" writes:
> : NetBSD 
> : Linux 
> : 
> : As you can see, the bonnie results show clearly that the currect SCSI driver
> : uses a lot CPU, but I assume that will improve in the future.
> 
> Keep in mind that the NetBSD code you are comparing against uses a
> really ancient version of their scsi code.  It is slow, even by their
> standards...
> 
> I find it interesting that all of the Byte tests were faster on
> NetBSD, however.  Odd, no?

Some of the MIPS code really needs tuning, some is already _fast_.  Everything
in order of priority.

  Ralf

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>