Re: FYI (part II)

[ralf@uni-koblenz.de]

On Thu, Feb 25, 1999 at 01:09:13AM -0700, Warner Losh wrote:

> In message <199902240854.JAA08376@sparta.research.kpn.com> "Houten
> K.H.C. van (Karel)" writes:
> : NetBSD 
> : Linux 
> : 
> : As you can see, the bonnie results show clearly that the currect SCSI driver
> : uses a lot CPU, but I assume that will improve in the future.
> 
> Keep in mind that the NetBSD code you are comparing against uses a
> really ancient version of their scsi code.  It is slow, even by their
> standards...
> 
> I find it interesting that all of the Byte tests were faster on
> NetBSD, however.  Odd, no?

Some of the MIPS code really needs tuning, some is already _fast_.  Everything
in order of priority.

  Ralf