Re: Problems w/ 2.1.131 on r3k

[ralf@uni-koblenz.de]

On Tue, Jan 26, 1999 at 01:40:03PM +0300, Vladimir Roganov wrote:

> We have traced problem with 4th syscall argument, so Ralf's additions
> with 'a3' saving looks reasonable, but same time they produce a
> question:
> 
>    Is it all/right places where 'a3' must be saved/restored ?
> 
> Namely, signal.c contains one more place where 'epc' will rolling back
> to 8 bytes. Until we put 'a3' restoring to that place, we still
> got our checkpoint in 'sys_wait4' (listed below) catching 'a3 == 1'.
> (I also will happy to get explanation why other syscall parameters
> are saved correctly in current code :-)

Good spotting, I missed that other case.

  Ralf