| To: | linux-mips@fnet.fr |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: NFSROOT problem on '260 resolved |
| From: | Florian Lohoff <flo@rfc822.org> |
| Date: | Mon, 4 Jan 1999 01:47:08 +0100 |
| In-reply-to: | <19990104013150.A3325@alpha.franken.de>; from Thomas Bogendoerfer on Mon, Jan 04, 1999 at 01:31:50AM +0100 |
| References: | <XFMail.990103212552.harald.koerfgen@netcologne.de> <19990104003551.A25704@mini.gt.owl.de> <19990104013150.A3325@alpha.franken.de> |
| Sender: | flo@mini.gt.owl.de |
On Mon, Jan 04, 1999 at 01:31:50AM +0100, Thomas Bogendoerfer wrote: > On Mon, Jan 04, 1999 at 12:35:52AM +0100, Florian Lohoff wrote: > > BTW: It is a pain in the ass for every "new" kernel to patch asm-mips > > _LANGUAGE_ASSEMBLY vs __LANGUAGE_ASSEMBLY__ for gcc. > > how about changing your gcc spec file ? I do not say that it does not make sense but as a newbie as i am its hard enough to build a cross-compiler and then change spec files ? Ah BTW: other architectures (i386/sparc/m68k) use "__ASSEMBLY__" shouldnt we ? I only want something clean what uses to work with an out-of-the-box gcc as it was Linux-Kernel behaviour. Flo -- Florian Lohoff flo@rfc822.org +49-5241-470566 Good, Fast, Cheap: Pick any two (you can't have all three). (RFC 1925) |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: NFSROOT problem on '260 resolved, Thomas Bogendoerfer |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: NFSROOT problem on '260 resolved, Florian Lohoff |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: NFSROOT problem on '260 resolved, Thomas Bogendoerfer |
| Next by Thread: | Re: NFSROOT problem on '260 resolved, Thomas Bogendoerfer |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |