On Mon, Jan 04, 1999 at 12:35:52AM +0100, Florian Lohoff wrote:
> BTW: It is a pain in the ass for every "new" kernel to patch asm-mips
> _LANGUAGE_ASSEMBLY vs __LANGUAGE_ASSEMBLY__ for gcc.
how about changing your gcc spec file ?
From: Ulf Carlsson <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Reply-To: Ulf Carlsson <email@example.com>
To: Thomas Bogendoerfer <firstname.lastname@example.org>
cc: Richard Hartensveld <email@example.com>,
Subject: Re: crosscompiling on debian/i386
On Thu, 1 Oct 1998, Thomas Bogendoerfer wrote:
> no he tries to crosscompile with gcc-2.7.2.x a new kernel from CVS.
> This does no longer work out of the box, because we've changed the
> #ifdef _LANGUAGE_ASSEMBLY to the egcs predefined ones. And these aren't
> defined in the gcc-2.7 spec file.
> I don't have a patch handy, but simply changing -D__LANGUAGE_ASSMBLEY__ to
> -D_LANGUAGE_ASSEMBLY and -D__LANGUAGE_C__ to -D_LANGUAGE_C in the spec
> file worked for me.
I've already changed those defines.
I don't have a patch (I don't have the old file anylonger), but I can send
the whole file (/usr/local/lib/gcc-lib/mips-linux/220.127.116.11/specs)
This device has completely bogus header. Compaq scores again :-|
It's a host bridge, but it should be called ghost bridge instead ;^)
[Martin `MJ' Mares on linux-kernel]
Description: Binary data