| To: | linux-mips@fnet.fr |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Lmbench results for Linux/MIPS 2.1.90 |
| From: | Dominic Sweetman <dom@algor.co.uk> |
| Date: | Sun, 5 Apr 1998 12:15:22 +0100 (BST) |
| In-reply-to: | <19980405120602.27673@uni-koblenz.de> |
| References: | <19980322075452.09681@uni-koblenz.de> <199803230530.VAA12819@fir.engr.sgi.com> <19980405120602.27673@uni-koblenz.de> |
ralf@uni-koblenz.de (ralf@uni-koblenz.de) writes: > I'm thinking about changing the calling sequence of syscalls as well. > When we get more than four arguments passed, we have to dig them out of > the userstack. Someone else mentioned n32/64; these new SGI standards pass up to 8 arguments in registers. Making syscalls different from all other function calls would be kind of a kludge. Dominic Sweetman dom@algor.co.uk |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Lmbench results for Linux/MIPS 2.1.90, ralf |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: EGCS on MIPS, ralf |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Lmbench results for Linux/MIPS 2.1.90, ralf |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Lmbench results for Linux/MIPS 2.1.90, ralf |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |