| To: | linux-mips |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Question of code organisation... |
| From: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@Julia.DE> |
| Date: | Fri, 11 Apr 1997 14:39:43 +0200 (MET DST) |
| In-reply-to: | <199704110716.HAA12418@suede.sw.oz.au> from "Paul Antoine" at Apr 11, 97 05:16:13 pm |
Hi, > > > ...is this preferred, or would it be better to have machine-specific sub- > > > directories? My only worry is that with the number of DECstation models, > > > there may be quite a few dec-specific files... and I think even the SGI > > > stuff is begining to look a little messy. > > > > Similar for other machines. We've that many different types of MIPS > > machines > > that we'll end up with zillions of files in one directory. > > So is this a 'yes, you can organise the dec stuff that way', or a 'no need, > it'll all be a mess anyway' in answer to my question/proposal?? I meant use a directory to avoid the mess. Ralf |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Almost got 2.1.14.2 to a patchable stage..., Ralf Baechle |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Almost got 2.1.14.2 to a patchable stage..., Miguel de Icaza |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Question of code organisation..., Paul Antoine |
| Next by Thread: | Almost got 2.1.14.2 to a patchable stage..., Paul Antoine |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |