> > Ok, that's cool. But then why do computer manufacturers still incorporate
> > cache into today's machines instead of using blazing memory interfaces?
> For i486 machines there was a chipset which in most real world benchmarks was
> outrunning all other machines with or without L2 cache just because of
> a RAM interface with all tricks in the book. Damn, can't remember it's
> name ...
It's the Shasta chipset from Headland.
The name came back to me when I squeezed X through the compiler last
night. Client are running now, btw.