> > We would like to know the current status of the IRQ code for the
> >DEC 5000/125. How close is it to being completed?
I have a timer interrupt working on my DS5000/200 and will (hopefully) soon
have it running on the 2100/3100. IIRC, the dispatching of the several
interrupt sources (they all jump to the same address) still makes some
> >Also, if anyone out
> >there has worked on the console code for the said machine, I'd much
> >appreciate a response as that's what we'd like to work on.
Basically, the REX routines should work for you - at least they work for
my DS5000/120 here. This may, however, not work related to PROM revision
I have a console driver that works on the 2100/3100 and _should_ work on
a standard CX graphics board (haven't tried yet). For the DS5000/1xx, one
should only have to adapt the serial driver code for the Z8530 that the
5000/1xx uses (instead of the DZ11 chip in the other DECstations). I have
the Zilog data book for the Z8530 here, but haven't yet searched for the
I/O addresses of the 8530 [and I'm afraid the keyboard port on my 5000/120
is not working :-( - well, I got it for free :-)]
> >So the
> >sharing of knowledge can be a good thing. Also, has anyone looked
> >around in the NetBSD code for information about the hardware, I've
> >looked around in there. You'd be surprised about the knowledge in
Yes ... and also by the chaos and badly documented code in NetBSD :-( ...
Three other sources of information that may be relevant are
- Sprite by John Ousterhout (Berkeley) from ftp.cs.berkeley.edu
- Xinu/DECstation (runs only on 3100 (maybe 2100, too) with serial console)
> >Also, there are references to DEC manuals that were used to
> >create the code.
Yeah ... John "Maddog" Hall is still working on getting the documentation -
any news on that, Paul (I'm afraid not :-() ? DEC sometimes seems to have
lots of trouble finding their own documentation.
> That is exactly the point, where i'd like to start. As far as i can see
> the NetBSD Sources are the only source of information available yet,
> at least for kmins and maxines. I know this can be more difficult
> than starting from scratch, but why don't we use it, is there
> something i am missing?
Nope, try it. We may not reuse code from NetBSD because of some silly
copyright restrictions (but we could always use code from OpenBSD or
4.4BSD Lite, I think). If you find out information on the 5000/1xx and Maxine
(a list of I/O adresses etc.), that'd be great !
Michael Engel (email@example.com)