: You think this is *big*? I've already stripped all local symbols out of
: the archive. Otherwise libc.a would be far bigger.
I was thinking more in terms of how many forks/execs of gcc you'd need
to run thought, and the amount of the memory that they used might even
push you into swapping.
: Indeed my system is relativly useable now. Crash reason #1 during the
: last time was my IDE disk, which I already had thrown away because of
: too many read errors ... I just had digged it out again because I don't
: own no other IDE disk. The whole thing is however still not 100%
: reliable. The stupid thing with the remaining bugs that crash the kernel
: is, that they rarely leave a useable information for debugging - but I'm
: working on 'em.
Gotta get one of them there SCSI drives :-). What's an IDE drive
doing on that fast MIPS box :-) I recently scammed the use of a 320M
hard drive, but haven't put anything on it yet....