>
> Consider even the fact that we have quite some different machine types and
> just a few more developers. No good thing for fast advance. I'm a big fan
> of hard and software architectures that are not as uniform as the biggest
> part of the PC and Mac world. But we're beyond what is acceptable.
>
Why? We're currently working on actually *two* different platforms:
Jazz and rPC44. The differences between the three jazz systems are
rather minor. With the SNI we would have three different targets.
>
> As example - GCC's makefile tries to test the cross compiler by building a
> little program. That of course fails because there are no libraries
> installed yet. You again can't build the library because the compiler isn't
> installed yet. So you need to install the compiler manually. Some minor
> changes in the kernel also break compiling the old libc 4.6.27 that I'm
> discontinuing to support and oh, why is that damned float.h thing GCC is
> always complaining about ...
I know... It's a pain to compile the compiler & tools around.
> >
> > I think that everyone should agree on this.
>
> Of course. The big time of nuking everything is over. Just some minor
> fixes are missing; then we should be in the *real* Linux buisness.
>
Ok, then let's come to a decision about the SNI and then clear the
TODO list :-)
BTW, Ralf, would be good if you could come before 16:00h or so.
At 17:30 I have another date, and I also need to prepare some
demo web pages for a customer...
Cheers,
Andy
-----------------------------------------------------------
Andreas Busse | andy@soft-n-hard.de
Soft N Hard GbR | Phone: +49 2636-970105
Im Hufen Boden 16, D-53498 Waldorf | Fax: +49 2636-970106
-----------------------------------------------------------
|