| To: | linux-mips@fnet.fr |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: New uploads |
| From: | Systemkennung Linux <linux@mailhost.uni-koblenz.de> |
| Date: | Tue, 21 Nov 1995 17:29:45 +0100 (MET) |
| In-reply-to: | <199511211417.PAA18811@newton.soft-n-hard.de> from "Andreas Busse" at Nov 21, 95 03:17:18 pm |
Hi, > > No. But again applying his patches to 1.3 won't too much trouble. > Ok. So what? First into 1.2.whatever or directly into 1.3.whatever? I said send me patches for 1.2 or 1.2 - it doesn't matter. I can integrate them into 1.3. > If the stuff shall go into 1.3.x, when can we have a reliable > source tree that doesn't change every 5 minutes? I guess we're supposed to do software *development*. If you however want to keep you kernel sources from changing I can recommend CD-ROMs. Guaranteed not to change ;-) > Is it really a good idea to hack a new linker right now? > Wouldn't it be better to wait for 2.6.1/2/3 or, even better, > to send your patches to the GNU people so that they *stay* > in the source tree? I know your big love to ancient software - I don't share it. The gain of using the new software is normally bigger than of keeping the old. Ralf |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | linuxdox-sgml tools (was: project flow), Kai Harrekilde-Petersen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: New uploads, Andreas Busse |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: New uploads, Andreas Busse |
| Next by Thread: | Re: New uploads, Andreas Busse |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |