| To: | linux-mips@fnet.fr |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: New uploads |
| From: | Andreas Busse <andy@soft-n-hard.de> |
| Date: | Tue, 21 Nov 1995 15:17:18 +0100 |
| In-reply-to: | <199511211403.PAA06448@informatik.uni-koblenz.de> |
> > No. But again applying his patches to 1.3 won't too much trouble. > Ok. So what? First into 1.2.whatever or directly into 1.3.whatever? If the stuff shall go into 1.3.x, when can we have a reliable source tree that doesn't change every 5 minutes? > Apropos trouble - I'm just adding all the patches and bugfixes I > hacked for binutils 2.5.2 into 2.6. Means essentially doing the > whole work once again. But using the new features will make the > switch to ELF for bootstrapping much easier. Is it really a good idea to hack a new linker right now? Wouldn't it be better to wait for 2.6.1/2/3 or, even better, to send your patches to the GNU people so that they *stay* in the source tree? Andy ----------------------------------------------------------- Andreas Busse | andy@soft-n-hard.de Soft N Hard GbR | Phone: +49 2636-970105 Im Hufen Boden 16, D-53498 Waldorf | Fax: +49 2636-970106 ----------------------------------------------------------- |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Work [was: Re: SNI Alliance Partner], Andreas Busse |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: fwd: Re: Project flow..., Systemkennung Linux |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: New uploads, Systemkennung Linux |
| Next by Thread: | Re: New uploads, Systemkennung Linux |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |