linux-cvs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: mips/CVS vs stock 2.4.1

To: Jim Freeman <jfree@sovereign.org>
Subject: Re: mips/CVS vs stock 2.4.1
From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@oss.sgi.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2001 13:21:19 -0800
Cc: linux-cvs@oss.sgi.com
In-reply-to: <20010201135347.A1164@sovereign.org>; from jfree@sovereign.org on Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 01:53:47PM -0700
References: <20010201135347.A1164@sovereign.org>
Sender: owner-linux-cvs@oss.sgi.com
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 01:53:47PM -0700, Jim Freeman wrote:

> To: linux-cvs@oss.sgi.com

Please don't post to linux-cvs; this list is only intended as an announce-
ment list for CVS commits.

> In comparing the stock 2.4.1 kernel sources with this AM's mips CVS
> update, I found the following differences in portions of the tree
> where mips-isms aren't involved :
> 
> Directories that stock 2.4.1 has, but mips/CVS doesn't
> (if added to mips/CVS repository and sync'd against stock 2.4.1,
>  the mips vs stock diff would be saner?) :

> Non-mips related directories mips has, but not present in stock 2.4.1
> (all empty, except for CVS-relate overhead - should be trimmed out of CVS?) :

cvs update -d -P

Wtf people don't read documentation?

We had five directories which only contained .cvsignore files, though.

  Ralf

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>